Vocabulary and Vernacular

 Language and Dialect Article

Sentiment 2007, Volume. 7, Number 1, 131–146

Copyright 3 years ago by the American Psychological Connection 1528-3542/07/$12. 00 DOI: 10. 1037/1528-3542. six. 1 . 131

Toward a Dialect Theory: Cultural Differences in the Expression and Recognition of Posed Face Expressions Hillary Anger Elfenbein

University of California, Berkeley

Martin Beaupre Вґ

University of Quebec, canada , at Montreal

Manon Levesque Вґ

Omar Bongo School

Ursula Hess

University of Quebec by Montreal

Two studies presented direct support for a recently proposed vernacular theory of communicating feelings, positing that expressive displays show ethnic variations similar to linguistic dialects, thereby decreasing accurate identification by out-group members. In Study one particular, 60 individuals from Quebec and Gabon posed cosmetic expressions. Dialects, in the form of activating different muscle tissue for the same movement, emerged many clearly to get serenity, pity, and disregard and also intended for anger, unhappiness, surprise, and happiness, but is not for fear, disgust, or perhaps embarrassment. In Study two, Quebecois and Gabonese participants judged these kinds of stimuli and stimuli standardized to remove cultural dialects. As predicted, an in-group advantage emerged for nonstandardized expressions just and most strongly for expression with increased regional dialects, according to examine 1 . Keywords: emotion, appearance, recognition, dialects, in-group benefit

An enduring query in the examine of mental facial expressions is the extent to which these expressions happen to be universal (e. g., Darwin, 1872/1965) compared to culturally determined. A considerable human body of study supports the conclusion that the appearance of emotion is largely widespread and biologically evolved, for example , through similarities between human and nonhuman emotional expressions (e. g., Chevalier-Skolnikoff, 1973; Darwin, 1872/1965; Redican, 1982) and the shared recognition of emotional alerts across species boundaries (e. g., Itakura, 1994; Linnankoski, Laasko, & Leinonen, 1994). Across nationalities, classic studies by Ekman, Izard, and their colleagues (Ekman, 1972, 1994; Ekman ou al., 1987; Izard, 1971) have demonstrated that displays of basic feelings are well recognized even across cultures that contain relatively small contact with the other person. This watch contrasts with perspectives observing emotional patterns as determined com-

pletely by social influences in social prescriptions (e. g., Lutz & White, 1986; Wierzbicka, 1994). Many approaches take an intermediate situation (e. g., Ekman, 72; Fiske, Kitayama, Markus, & Nisbett, 1998; Fridlund, 1994; Mesquita, Frijda, & Scherer, 1997; Rosenthal, Hall, DiMatteo, Rogers, & Archer, 1979), acknowledging the two universals and cultural variants in the expression and recognition of feelings. The current content focuses on the type of intermediate perspective: the dialect theory of communicating feeling. Dialect theory proposes arsenic intoxication cultural differences in the use of cues for psychological expression which might be subtle enough to allow correct communication throughout cultural limitations in general, but substantive enough to cause a potential for misunderstanding (Elfenbein & Ambady, 2002b, 2003).

Elaborating the Vernacular Theory

In linguistics, dialects are the alternatives or types of a terminology used by different speakers whom are segregated by geographic or cultural boundaries (Francis, 1992; Romaine, 1994). While there is an old saying that a language is simply a vernacular with its individual army and navy (Fasold, 1984)—suggesting a sometimes irrelavent distinction between two concepts—linguists argue that dialects but not different languages should allow basic shared comprehension (O'Grady, Archibald, Aronoff, & Rees-Miller, 2001). Accordingly, the language theory of communicating sentiment argues that the language of emotion can be universal. Much like other dialects, different nationalities can go to town in different dialects, which is the first proposition of dialect theory. The 2nd proposition would be that the...

References: Bavelas, J. W., Black, A., Lemery, C. R., & Mullett, T. (1986). " I show how you feel”: Motor mimicry as a expansive act. Diary of Persona and Interpersonal Psychology, 60, 322–329. Beaupre, M. G., & Hess, U. (2005). Cross-cultural feeling recognition ´ among Canadian ethnic organizations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 355–370. Biehl, M., Matsumoto, M., Ekman, S., Hearn, Versus., Heider, E., Kudoh, To., & Lot, V. (1997). Matsumoto and Ekman's Western and Black Facial Expression of Sentiment (JACFEE): Reliability data and cross-national dissimilarities. Journal of Nonverbal Habit, 21, 3–21. Buck, Ur. (1984). The communication of emotion. New York: Guilford Press. Buhler, E. (1934). Sprachtheorie [Language theory. ] Jena, Germany: ¨ Fischer. Burquest, D. A., & Payne, D. L. (1993). Phonological analysis: A functional approach. Based in dallas, TX: Summer season Institute of Linguistics. Camras, L. A., Oster, L., Campos, T. J., Miyake, K., & Bradshaw. (1997). Japanese and American infants' responses to arm restraint. In L. Ekman & E. D. Rosenberg (Eds. ), What the face shows: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression making use of the Facial Actions Coding System (FACS) (pp. 289 –301). New York: Oxford University Press. Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S i9000. (1973). Cosmetic expression of emotion in non-human primates. In S. Ekman (Ed. ), Darwin and facial expression (pp. 11– 83). New York: Academics Press. Darwin, C. (1965). The expression from the emotions in man and animals. Chicago, il: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1872) Ekman, S. (1972). Universals and ethnical differences in face expressions of emotion. In J. T. Cole (Ed. ), Nebraska Symposium in Motivation: Volume. 19 (pp. 207–283). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Ekman, G. (1979). Regarding brows: Mental and conversational signs. In M. Von Cranach, E. Foppa, W. Lepenies, & D. Ploog (Eds. ), Human ethology (pp. 169 –249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Ekman, G. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Knowledge and Feeling, 6, 169 –200. Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in cosmetic expressions: A reply to Russell's mistaken review. Psychological Program, 115, 268 – 287. Ekman, S., & Friesen, W. V. (1976). Images of facial affect [Slides]. Bay area: Department of Psychology, S . fransisco State University or college. Ekman, G., & Friesen, W. Versus. (1978). Cosmetic Action Coding System: A strategy for the measurement of facial movements. Palo Elevado, CA: Talking to Psychologists Press. Ekman, G., Friesen, Watts. V., O'Sullivan, M., Chan, A., DiacoyanniTarlatzis, I., Heider, K., ain al. (1987). Universals and cultural differences in the conclusions of face expressions of emotion. Journal of Persona and Cultural Psychology, 53, 712–717. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Simons, R. C. (1985). Is a startle effect an feeling? Journal of Personality and Social Mindset, 49, 1416 – 1426. Ekman, P., Sorensen, Electronic. R., & Friesen, T. V. (1969, April 4). Pancultural elements in face displays of emotions. Scientific research, 164, eighty six – 88. Elfenbein, H. A. (2006). Learning in emotion decision: Training plus the

cross-cultural comprehension of facial movement. Journal of non-verbal Behavior, 30, 21–36. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, D. (2002a). Is there an in-group advantage in emotion? Mental Bulletin, 128, 243–249. Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002b). On the universality and social specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Program, 128, 203–235. Elfenbein, L. A., & Ambady, D. (2003). When ever familiarity bread of dogs accuracy: Ethnic exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Individuality and Cultural Psychology, eighty five, 276 –290. Elfenbein, H. A., Mandal, M. K., Ambady, And., Harizuka, H., & Kumar, S. (2002). Cross-cultural patterns in emotion recognition: Highlighting design and analytical techniques. Emotion, a couple of, 75– 84. Fasold, R. (1984. ) The sociolinguistics of world. Oxford, Britain: Basil Blackwell. Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. Elizabeth. (1998). The cultural matrix of cultural psychology. In D. To. Gilbert, S i9000. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds. ), The handbook of social psychology (4th male impotence., Vol. two, pp. 915–981). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Francis, W. N. (1992). Dialectology. In W. Bright (Ed. ), International encyclopedia of linguistics (pp. 349 –355). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Frank, Meters. G., & Stennett, M. (2001). The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of cosmetic expressions of emotion. Log of Individuality and Interpersonal Psychology, eighty, 75– eighty five. Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human face expression: An evolutionary watch. San Diego, FLORIDA: Academic Press. Galati, Deb., Scherer, K. R., & Ricci-Bitti, P. E. (1997). Voluntary facial expressions of emotion: Evaluating congenitally window blind with normal sighted encoders. Journal of Personality and Social Mindset, 73, 1363–1379. Hall, M. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding non-verbal tips. Psychological Message, 85, 845– 857. Lounge, J. A. (1984). non-verbal sex distinctions: Accuracy of communication and expressive design. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins College or university Press. Hess, U., Banse, R., & Kappas, A. (1995). The intensity of facial expression is determined by underlying affective express and social situation. Log of Persona and Sociable Psychology, 69, 280 –288. Hess, U., Blairy, T., & Kleck, R. Electronic. (2000). The influence of expression intensity, gender, and ethnicity in judgments of dominance and affiliation. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, twenty four, 265–283. Hess, U., Senecal, S., & Kirouac, G. (1996). Realizing emotional face ´ expressions: Does recognized sociolinguistic group make a difference? International Journal of Psychology, thirty-one, 3– four. Hess, U., Senecal, S i9000., Kirouac, G., Herrera, L., Philippot, P., & Kleck, R. Elizabeth. ´ (2000). Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Honnetete and Feelings, 14, 609 – 642. Horstmann, G. (2002). Cosmetic expressions of emotion: Does the prototype stand for central tendency, frequency of instantiation, or perhaps an ideal? Feeling, 2, 297–305. Itakura, H. (1994). Differentiated responses in order to human circumstances in chimpanzees. Perceptual and Motor Abilities, 79, 1288 –1290. Izard, C. At the. (1971). The eye of feelings. New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts. Izard, C. E., & Haynes, O. M. (1988). On the contact form and universality of the disregard expression: Difficult to Ekman and Friesen's claim of discovery. Determination and Feelings, 12, 1–22. Jakobs, E., Manstead, A. S. L., & Fischer, A. L. (2001). Cultural context results on facial activity within a negative emotional setting. Feeling, 1, 51– 69. Keltner, D. (1995). Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinctive displays of embarrassment, entertainment, and disgrace. Journal of Personality and Social Mindset, 68, 441– 454.

146

´ ´ ELFENBEIN, BEAUPRE, LEVESQUE, AND HESS Pere, L. T., & Johnson, C. A. (1994). On the distinct connotations of smiles and frowns. Cognition and Emotion, eight, 65–72. Redican, W. T. (1982). An evolutionary perspective on individual facial shows. In S. Ekman (Ed. ), Feelings in the individual face (2nd ed., pp. 212–280). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press. Ricci Bitti, G. E., Brighetti, G., Garotti, P. M., & Boggi-Cavallo, P. (1989). Is disregard expressed by simply pancultural cosmetic movements? In J. G. Forgas & J. Meters. Innes (Eds. ), Recent advances in social mindset: An international perspective (pp. 329 –339). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Rinn, W. E. (1984). The neuropsychology of facial expression: A review of the neurological and psychological mechanisms for generating facial expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 52–77. Romaine, S i9000. (1994). Vernacular and dialectology. In Ur. E. Asher & J. M. Con. Simpson (Eds. ), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. 900 –907). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. Rosenthal, L., Hall, T. A., DiMatteo, M. L., Rogers, G. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Awareness to nonverbal communication: The PONS Evaluation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, L. L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral exploration: Methods and data analysis (2nd male impotence. ). New York: McGraw-Hill. Russell, J. A. (1991). Adverse results on the reported facial expression of contempt. Motivation and Sentiment, 15, 285–292. Russell, T. A. (1994). Is there widespread recognition of emotion from facial appearance? A review of the cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 102–141. Scherer, E. R. (1999). Appraisal theory. In To. Dalgleish & M. T. Power (Eds. ), Guide of cognition and feelings (pp. 637– 663). Chichester, England: Wiley. Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal regarded as a process of multilevel continuous checking. In K. Scherer, A. Schorr & T. Johnston (Eds. ), Evaluation processes in emotions: Theory, methods, exploration (pp. 92– 120). Nyc: Oxford University Press. Scherer, K. L., Banse, L., & Wallbott, H. (2001). Emotion inferences from vocal expression correlate across dialects and cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 76 –92. Sorensen, E. Ur. (1975). Culture and the expression of emotion. In To. R. Williams (Ed. ), Psychological anthropology (pp. 361–372). Chicago: Aldine. Suissa, S i9000., & Shuster, J. (1985). Exact unconditional sample sizes for the 2 2 binomial trial. Diary of the Hoheitsvoll Statistical Culture, Series A, 148, 317–327. Thibault, L., Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (2006). The effect of groupidentification on emotion acknowledgement: The case of cats and basketball players. Journal of Experimental Cultural Psychology, forty two, 676 – 683. Tomkins, S. H., & McCarter, R. (1964). What and where are definitely the primary affects: Some data for a theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 119 –158. Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Emotion, terminology, and ethnic scripts. In S. Kitayama & L. R. Markus (Eds. ), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual impact. Washington, DC: American Mental Association. Wiggers, M. (1982). Judgements of facial expression of thoughts predicted by facial behavior. Journal of non-verbal Behavior, 7, 101–116.

Keltner, G., & Buswell, B. D. (1997). Distress: Its unique form and appeasement functions. Psychological Message, 122, 250 –270. Kilbride, J. At the., & Yarczower, M. (1983). Ethnic bias in the recognition of facial expressions. Record of non-verbal Behavior, almost eight, 27– forty one. Kirouac, G., & Dore, F. Y. (1985). Accuracy and reliability of the judgments of face ´ phrase of feelings as a function of sexual intercourse and education level. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9, 3–7. Kirouac, G., & Hess, U. (1999). Group membership and the decoding of non-verbal behavior. In P. Philippot, R. Feldman, & At the. Coats (Eds. ), The social circumstance of non-verbal behavior (pp. 182–210). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Knutson, M. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion effect interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182. Linnankoski, I., Laasko, M. L., & Leinonen, L. (1994). Recognition of emotions in macaque vocalizations by children and adults. Language and Communication, 18, 183–192. Lutz, C., & White, G. M. (1986). The anthropology of emotions. Annual Report on Anthropology, 15, 405– 436. Mandal, Meters. K., Bryden, M. G., & Bulman-Fleming, M. W. (1996). Similarities and different versions in face expressions of emotion: Cross-cultural evidence. Worldwide Journal of Psychology, 23, 49 –58. Markham, L., & Wang, L. (1996). Recognition of emotion simply by Chinese and Australian children. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 616 – 643. Marsh, A. A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). non-verbal " accents”: Ethnic differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychology, 14, 373–376. Matsumoto, Deb. (1989). Ethnic influences on the perception of emotion. Record of Cross-Cultural Psychology, twenty, 92–105. Matsumoto, D. (1992). More proof for the universality of the contempt expression. Motivation and Emotion, sixteen, 363–368. Matsumoto, D. (2002). Methodological requirements to test a possible in-group advantage in judging emotions throughout cultures: Responses on Elfenbein and Ambady (2002) and evidence. Emotional Bulletin, 128, 236 –242. Matsumoto, D. (in press). Apples and oranges: Methodological requirements intended for testing a possible ingroup advantage in emotion judgments from facial movement. In U. Hess & P. Philippot (Eds. ), Group mechanics and emotional expression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Matsumoto, D., & Assar, M. (1992). The effects of terminology on decision of general facial expression of feelings. Journal of non-verbal Behavior, 16, 85–99. Mesquita, M., & Frijda, N. They would. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: An evaluation. Psychological Bulletins, 112, 197–204. Mesquita, B., Frijda, In. H., & Scherer, E. R. (1997). Culture and emotion. In J. W. Berry, P. R. Dasen, & Capital t. S. Saraswathi (Eds. ), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. a couple of: Basic processes and individual development (2nd ed., pp. 255–297). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Motley, M. Capital t. (1993). Facial affect and verbal circumstance in dialogue: Facial appearance as interjection. Human Conversation Research, twenty, 3– forty. O'Grady, T., Archibald, M., Aronoff, Meters., & Rees-Miller, J. (2001). Contemporary linguistics (4th ed. ). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's Press. Ecourte Robert. (2004). Dictionnaire de la langue Francaise [Dictionary of the People from france language]. Paris, france: Distribooks.

Received December 3, 2005 Revision received 06 8, 2006 Accepted 06 19, 06\

Popular